Latest bunch of doc changes

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup

Hi folks,

I am not particularly happy about my repeated procrastination, but at
least I combed through the relevant documentation changes and pushed a
bunch of them to the translation branch.  If anybody wants to have a go
at them before 2.18.2 will get released, holler and I'll see whether
I can delay Phil's rolling a release for a day or so.  Without notice,
he tends to start the process typically some time on Sunday.

Sorry for this last-minute notice that really should not have been
necessary if I had my act together properly.

--
David Kastrup


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Jean-Charles MALAHIEUDE
Le 15/03/2014 13:44, David Kastrup disait :

>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am not particularly happy about my repeated procrastination, but at
> least I combed through the relevant documentation changes and pushed a
> bunch of them to the translation branch.  If anybody wants to have a go
> at them before 2.18.2 will get released, holler and I'll see whether
> I can delay Phil's rolling a release for a day or so.  Without notice,
> he tends to start the process typically some time on Sunday.
>

I'm on it in French… and let you know.

--
Jean-Charles




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Federico Bruni-2
2014-03-15 16:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]>:
Le 15/03/2014 13:44, David Kastrup disait :


Hi folks,

I am not particularly happy about my repeated procrastination, but at
least I combed through the relevant documentation changes and pushed a
bunch of them to the translation branch.  If anybody wants to have a go
at them before 2.18.2 will get released, holler and I'll see whether
I can delay Phil's rolling a release for a day or so.  Without notice,
he tends to start the process typically some time on Sunday.


I'm on it in French… and let you know.


me too 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Jean-Charles MALAHIEUDE
Le 15/03/2014 17:14, Federico Bruni disait :

> 2014-03-15 16:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Le 15/03/2014 13:44, David Kastrup disait :
>>
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> If anybody wants to have a go at them before 2.18.2 will get released,
>>> holler and I'll see whether I can delay Phil's rolling a release for
>>> a day or so.  Without notice, he tends to start the process typically
>>> some time on Sunday.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm on it in French… and let you know.
>>
>>
> me too
>

Just to let you know: input/regression/repeat-volta-segno.ly has a
version statement of 2.18.0 which chokes 'make doc'. Either temporarily
downgrade it or upgrade file 'VERSION'.

--
Jean-Charles



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup
Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:

> Le 15/03/2014 17:14, Federico Bruni disait :
>> 2014-03-15 16:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Le 15/03/2014 13:44, David Kastrup disait :
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> If anybody wants to have a go at them before 2.18.2 will get released,
>>>> holler and I'll see whether I can delay Phil's rolling a release for
>>>> a day or so.  Without notice, he tends to start the process typically
>>>> some time on Sunday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm on it in French… and let you know.
>>>
>>>
>> me too
>>
>
> Just to let you know: input/regression/repeat-volta-segno.ly has a
> version statement of 2.18.0 which chokes 'make doc'. Either
> temporarily downgrade it or upgrade file 'VERSION'.

It's probably a nuisance if you cannot compile translations, so I'll
upgrade VERSION.  It will cause merge conflicts into master, but I have
several of those already anyway.

--
David Kastrup


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Federico Bruni-2
2014-03-15 18:17 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[hidden email]>:
It's probably a nuisance if you cannot compile translations, so I'll
upgrade VERSION.  It will cause merge conflicts into master, but I have
several of those already anyway.

so the next stable will be 2.18.2? 2.18.1 has been skipped?

commit c0a15fedf45c535ae75faa0c7e3e6caca7a6e021
Author: David Kastrup <[hidden email]>
Date:   Mon Feb 17 16:41:39 2014 +0100

    Release: bump/rewind VERSION
    
    Since version 2.18.1 is not fit for general consumption, rewind
    VERSION_STABLE to 2.18.0 while bumping the next version to 2.18.2.
    
    (cherry picked from commit 48b3a7e2a5112de5dacc07dfd40e34bf9a09c3ca)
    
    Conflicts:
        VERSION

I'm running make doc...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Francisco Vila
In reply to this post by Federico Bruni-2
2014-03-15 17:14 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni <[hidden email]>:
> 2014-03-15 16:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]>:
>> I'm on it in French... and let you know.
>>
>
> me too

me too.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup
In reply to this post by Federico Bruni-2
Federico Bruni <[hidden email]> writes:

> 2014-03-15 18:17 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[hidden email]>:
>
>> It's probably a nuisance if you cannot compile translations, so I'll
>> upgrade VERSION.  It will cause merge conflicts into master, but I have
>> several of those already anyway.
>>
>
> so the next stable will be 2.18.2? 2.18.1 has been skipped?

Yes and no.  Just when it had started building I figured out that I had
cherry-picked unintended commits from the development branch in my rush
to get 2.18.1 out that weekend, and then Keith figured out that they
constituted an actually pretty solid regression, nothing one could
release in a stable branch.  Phil did not want to interrupt the
build/upload since he did not know what this might result in.  So we
decided not to announce it and to not link to it.

> commit c0a15fedf45c535ae75faa0c7e3e6caca7a6e021
> Author: David Kastrup <[hidden email]>
> Date:   Mon Feb 17 16:41:39 2014 +0100
>
>     Release: bump/rewind VERSION
>
>     Since version 2.18.1 is not fit for general consumption, rewind
>     VERSION_STABLE to 2.18.0 while bumping the next version to 2.18.2.
>
>     (cherry picked from commit 48b3a7e2a5112de5dacc07dfd40e34bf9a09c3ca)
>
>     Conflicts:
>         VERSION
>
> I'm running make doc...

Well yes, that's the story.

--
David Kastrup


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup
In reply to this post by Francisco Vila
Francisco Vila <[hidden email]> writes:

> 2014-03-15 17:14 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni <[hidden email]>:
>> 2014-03-15 16:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]>:
>>> I'm on it in French... and let you know.
>>>
>>
>> me too
>
> me too.

All of the usual suspects for timely translations...

Thanks for making the best of my bad pitches!

--
David Kastrup


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Francisco Vila
2014-03-15 20:38 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[hidden email]>:

> Francisco Vila <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> 2014-03-15 17:14 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni <[hidden email]>:
>>> 2014-03-15 16:12 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]>:
>>>> I'm on it in French... and let you know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> me too
>>
>> me too.

I think I'm done but please include the "Oops-fix xref" commit as
well. Now running make doc which I think previously failed only for
the bad xref.

The news-front file is in sync with our version of the file in
translation branch, which is old. I could compare manually with the
version in master.

--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup
In reply to this post by Jean-Charles MALAHIEUDE
Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:

> Le 15/03/2014 13:44, David Kastrup disait :
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I am not particularly happy about my repeated procrastination, but at
>> least I combed through the relevant documentation changes and pushed a
>> bunch of them to the translation branch.  If anybody wants to have a go
>> at them before 2.18.2 will get released, holler and I'll see whether
>> I can delay Phil's rolling a release for a day or so.  Without notice,
>> he tends to start the process typically some time on Sunday.
>>
>
> I'm on it in French… and let you know.

Well, I've seen that the amount of work was impressive.  Looks like
Italian and Spanish compile fine (I merged them to staging as well as
stable/2.18, and they tested well in staging).

I think having the French translation in 2.18.2 as well would be a good
idea.  Any idea about it so that Phil can plan on when to roll 2.18.2?
If it does not fit otherwise, we might stave the release off for a week.

Thanks

--
David Kastrup


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

Jean-Charles MALAHIEUDE
Le 16/03/2014 18:57, David Kastrup disait :

> Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:
>>
>> I'm on it in French… and let you know.
>
> Well, I've seen that the amount of work was impressive.  Looks like
> Italian and Spanish compile fine (I merged them to staging as well as
> stable/2.18, and they tested well in staging).
>
> I think having the French translation in 2.18.2 as well would be a good
> idea.  Any idea about it so that Phil can plan on when to roll 2.18.2?
> If it does not fit otherwise, we might stave the release off for a week.
>

Sorry to be in a rush (some unexpected visitors…)
I just pushed on Translation and hope to see the results in Phil's
rolling phase.

--
Jean-Charles




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup
Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:

> Le 16/03/2014 18:57, David Kastrup disait :
>> Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:
>>>
>>> I'm on it in French… and let you know.
>>
>> Well, I've seen that the amount of work was impressive.  Looks like
>> Italian and Spanish compile fine (I merged them to staging as well as
>> stable/2.18, and they tested well in staging).
>>
>> I think having the French translation in 2.18.2 as well would be a good
>> idea.  Any idea about it so that Phil can plan on when to roll 2.18.2?
>> If it does not fit otherwise, we might stave the release off for a week.
>>
>
> Sorry to be in a rush (some unexpected visitors…)
> I just pushed on Translation and hope to see the results in Phil's
> rolling phase.

Merged to both staging and stable/2.18 and started patchy-staging.  If it
completes successfully (takes probably 1h20 or so for me), that's a good
indication for the stuff on stable working out as well.

Thanks!

--
David Kastrup


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Latest bunch of doc changes

David Kastrup
David Kastrup <[hidden email]> writes:

> Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> Le 16/03/2014 18:57, David Kastrup disait :
>>> Jean-Charles Malahieude <[hidden email]> writes:
>>>>
>>>> I'm on it in French… and let you know.
>>>
>>> Well, I've seen that the amount of work was impressive.  Looks like
>>> Italian and Spanish compile fine (I merged them to staging as well as
>>> stable/2.18, and they tested well in staging).
>>>
>>> I think having the French translation in 2.18.2 as well would be a good
>>> idea.  Any idea about it so that Phil can plan on when to roll 2.18.2?
>>> If it does not fit otherwise, we might stave the release off for a week.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry to be in a rush (some unexpected visitors…)
>> I just pushed on Translation and hope to see the results in Phil's
>> rolling phase.
>
> Merged to both staging and stable/2.18 and started patchy-staging.  If it
> completes successfully (takes probably 1h20 or so for me), that's a good
> indication for the stuff on stable working out as well.
>
> Thanks!

The merge to staging has tested out fine.  So stable/2.18 should likely
work.  It's probably still a good idea to do one test&doc run.

--
David Kastrup